<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RapidWeaver vs Wordpress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.viewfromthedock.com/2007/11/rapidweaver-vs-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.viewfromthedock.com/2007/11/rapidweaver-vs-wordpress/</link>
	<description>mac-centric notes, reviews, tips, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:05:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Troy (admin)</title>
		<link>http://www.viewfromthedock.com/2007/11/rapidweaver-vs-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy (admin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viewfromthedock.com/2007/11/18/rapidweaver-vs-wordpress/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Ah, how I love a semantic discussion. Wordpress isn&#039;t an .app process, it&#039;s a web-based publishing platform. While RapidWeaver is a Mac app, it also functions as a publishing platform.  WP and RW are really CMS variations, so I figure either &#039;platform&#039; and &#039;system&#039; are valid for discussing these publishing tools. No?

BTW, this is obviously not using a new theme right now. This is the default Kubrick theme, but I&#039;ll update it and get my old theme back when I get motivated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, how I love a semantic discussion. Wordpress isn&#8217;t an .app process, it&#8217;s a web-based publishing platform. While RapidWeaver is a Mac app, it also functions as a publishing platform.  WP and RW are really CMS variations, so I figure either &#8216;platform&#8217; and &#8217;system&#8217; are valid for discussing these publishing tools. No?</p>
<p>BTW, this is obviously not using a new theme right now. This is the default Kubrick theme, but I&#8217;ll update it and get my old theme back when I get motivated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.viewfromthedock.com/2007/11/rapidweaver-vs-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viewfromthedock.com/2007/11/18/rapidweaver-vs-wordpress/#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Good work. I like your objective approach to software analysis. You identify an .app process as a platform.

 {I hope to provide a good overview of the capabilities of each&quot;platform.&quot;}

In the future, can you identify an application as software? Otherwise, some of your raven&#039; fans will also begin to identify software as a platform. 

Cheers!

//**d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work. I like your objective approach to software analysis. You identify an .app process as a platform.</p>
<p> {I hope to provide a good overview of the capabilities of each&#8221;platform.&#8221;}</p>
<p>In the future, can you identify an application as software? Otherwise, some of your raven&#8217; fans will also begin to identify software as a platform. </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>//**d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
